"Surprised", and claims to be the Moroccan Foreign Minister, Taib Fassi Fihri, who confessed to not understand why the English media is so interested in the murder of a teenager Sahara. In his view, the death of Elgarhi Nayem of only 14 years old, Rabat troops outside the camp Agdaym Izik, is irrelevant.
His cynicism is beyond measure. Speaking to the English agency EFE, the chancellor considered the Izik Agdaym cantonment, where there are some 25,000 Sahrawi citizens since 9 October, in the midst of a strong military cordon formed by all Moroccan occupation apparatus, "absolutely normal rule of law. " And specified, so you will not be in any doubt to anyone who expresses "on behalf of Her Majesty's Government" (Mohamed VI).
also without a hint of shame, the Rabat government spokesman, Khalid Naciri, Izik Agdaym ranked as a sign of "climate of freedom that prevails in Morocco." Clarified that this piece of land which he lists as part of Morocco's Western Sahara territory taken in 1975 after Spain relinquished its colony.
From the standpoint of the Alawite kingdom anyone could assume then that the Sahrawi are free to protest against the inequalities that are submitted by the government occupation. So why the Moroccan gendarmerie prevents water, food and medicine from reaching the camps? Why shoot at people who want to join the demonstration and not let the media get there to report what happens?
The English newspaper El Pais claims that Rabat "should be ashamed of this" climate "," but his arguments are very soft to condemn it as a comment that includes the regime of Mohamed "does not allow reporters to observe" about what happens in Agdaym Izik. Their concern is the onslaught of Rabat "against the English press." At no time accurate that what really should embarrass Morocco is to occupy its neighbor for 35 years and usurp natural resources. Perhaps it would be too much to ask a newspaper that on one occasion he published a booklet advertising on Morocco acknowledging that recognized the Saharawi occupied territories as part of Moroccan territory.
Well, besides the soft word of the Country, the truth is that very few reporters-not just English-have been introduced in Agdaym Izik, and made it through all sorts of subterfuges. So where is this "rule of law" which speaks both Rabat? Why fear the media introduce their microphones and cameras there?
Well, because rightly tell and explain the drama Saharan Morocco is to provide a "biased approach" which in the words of Foreign Minister Taieb Fassi Fihri, overestimate the view of those who Rabat considered as "offenders" of its "territorial integrity '(membership of the Sahara).
therefore drove the Al-Jazeera, which the Moroccan communication ministry accused of "irresponsible", very objectively, to alter the image of Morocco and could harm the interests (the usurped territoriality) and minimize achievements of Rabat in terms of 'democracy' and 'human rights. " Morocco
robs the Sahara, criminalizes the independence and torture in its prisons, but their struggle is peaceful, "locking up a military and police against 25 000 people who are seeking justice in Agdaym Izik, gave permission for the Bush for the CIA torture in secret prisons established in its territory, built antipersonnel minefields and bunkers on the wall up to divide the Sahara-and many deaths have caused "... and despite all the barbarity, the media wants to talk about a "climate of freedom." Be brazen and have the nerve ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment